A Statistical Dispatch from Draft Week · Football, 2026
The Sports Page
Making the numbers mean something since the first pitch
Issue No. 27April 24, 2026Distributed Free to Friends & Family

Same Stadium, Different Drafts: Jets vs. Giants, 50 Years In

The two teams share a market, a building, and as of this Thursday evening an actual draft class picked in the same city. Their first-round histories tell a less obvious story than the standings do — and not the one most fans would guess.
By The Columnist · The Sports Page · 1976–2025, Head-to-Head
54 vs 48
First-Round Picks Analyzed
1 vs 1
Hall of Famers Produced
Closer than you think
Bust-Rate Gap

The Jets and the Giants have shared the New Jersey Meadowlands for over forty years and, as of MetLife Stadium, literally share a building. The Giants, in the conventional telling, are the competent franchise across the parking lot — four Super Bowl titles, Lawrence Taylor, two Manning brothers, a well-run front office that drafts well. The Jets, in the conventional telling, are the other ones.

That story is mostly correct, but not for the reason fans usually give. The Giants’ superiority over the Jets has not come from first-round drafting, where the two teams are surprisingly comparable. It has come from everywhere else.

The Head-to-Head, Through Two Bust Lenses

Jets (1976–2022)Giants (1976–2022)
First-round picks made5448
Never made a Pro Bowl (Bust A)30 / 54 — 55.6%~34 / 48 — ~70.8%
Hall of Famers1 (Revis)1 (Taylor)
Franchise-defining All-Pros from first roundRevis; Mangold; FergusonTaylor; Simms; Banks; Shockey; JPP; OBJ; Barkley
Triple-busts (estimated)15 / 54 — 27.8%~10 / 48 — ~20.8%

Two results deserve attention. The Giants’ rate of picks that never made a Pro Bowl is actually higher than the Jets’, at roughly 71% vs. 56%. The Giants have drafted a lot of players who disappeared into roster anonymity — Cedric Jones, Ron Dayne, Jarrod Bunch, Kadarius Toney, Evan Neal. The Jets, by that narrow measure, have actually done better.

But on the triple-bust rate — the composite metric that requires a player to fail every definition of success — the Giants come in cleaner, at roughly 21% to the Jets’ 28%. The Giants have had more picks that at least produced a few starting seasons. The Jets have had more picks that failed on every axis simultaneously.

“The Giants’ first-round history is not the reason they have four rings and the Jets have one. The difference was made elsewhere on the roster. Their drafts, in the first round, are closer to each other than either fanbase believes.”

— The Columnist, on where the real gap lives

Where the Giants Actually Built Their Dynasty

Look at the rosters of the Giants’ four Super Bowl winners. Lawrence Taylor, a first-round pick, is the obvious spine of the 1986 and 1990 champions. After that, the picture shifts. Phil Simms was a first-rounder and the 1986 MVP. But the 1990, 2007, and 2011 champions were built disproportionately through:

The Jets, across the same era, have not produced anything comparable from their non-first-round picks, their trades, or their free-agency signings. That is where the gap lives. The first-round draft rooms, stripped of context, are not where the Giants have beaten the Jets by five-to-one. They have beaten the Jets five-to-one in everything else.

Top-of-the-Draft: Similar Floors, Different Ceilings

Slot rangeJets All-ProsGiants All-Pros
Picks 1–5Keyshawn Johnson; Darnold*; Zach Wilson*; Quinnen WilliamsTaylor (HOF); Carl Banks; Rivers (traded); Barkley; Thibodeaux
Picks 6–10Farrior; Revis (HOF); Gholston*; Leonard Williams; AdamsJeter; Haynes; Simms; King; Nabers**
Picks 11–20Abraham; Pennington; Vilma; Glenn; Milliner*; Richardson; Coples*; Pryor*; Darron Lee*Shockey; Pugh; OBJ; JPP; Engram; Kinard; Hampton; Apple*; Flowers*
Picks 21–32Mangold; Keller; K.Wilson; Wilkerson; Gardner; G.Wilson; J.Johnson; AVTPhillips; Nicks; Amukamara; Engram; Ross; Kiwanuka; Thomas; Toney*; Neal*

*denotes triple-bust by at least two of our three definitions. **2024 pick, too young to judge.

Methodology Note

Bust rates for the Giants were computed using the same three definitions as the preceding Jets piece: (A) never made a Pro Bowl, (B) career AV below the expected value for the draft slot, (C) fewer than 4 seasons as the primary Giants starter. Giants player data is drawn from Wikipedia’s first-round pick index with Pro Bowl and Approximate Value figures from Pro-Football-Reference. Picks from 2023–2025 are excluded from the bust rate as too young to evaluate.

The Definition B and Definition C calculations for the Giants remain approximate in this first pass; a full 32-team parallel dataset is a follow-up project. Numbers in this piece are rounded and directionally accurate; refinements will be published in a Sunday Edition.

What This Week’s Draft Does to the Analysis

On Thursday night in Pittsburgh, both New York teams will make new first-round selections. Neither of those picks will be in the dataset above, and neither can be evaluated for years. What can be said, from the fifty-year base rate, is this: whatever player the Jets pick at seventh overall has roughly a one-in-four chance of being a triple-bust by the definitions used here, and a roughly even chance of producing more than two Pro Bowl seasons. The Giants’ pick, wherever it lands, faces similar base rates, tilted slightly more favorably by the franchise’s record of producing at least minimal starters.

The honest takeaway: if the Jets and Giants make equivalent picks this week, the odds say they will end up closer to each other than the Twitter discourse Friday morning will suggest. The gap between the two franchises in the modern era has been built on everything except the first round. Thursday night is not where the story is written. The next forty years of roster-building around these picks is.

Sunday Edition will include both teams’ 2026 picks with a provisional draft-class grade relative to slot expectation.

Got a stat that doesn’t make sense?

Send it. We’ll find what the math is hiding — and we just might write the next issue about it.

Submit via GitHub → Or Email Patrick
The Sports Page
Share The Sports Page
Scan the code or share the link. Free, always.
QR Code
thesportspage.net
© 2026 The Sports Page · A Statistical Dispatch for Friends & Family
Licensed under The Sports Page License · Borrow it, give it back better · Non-commercial, attribution required
Not sure what counts as commercial? Take the 2-minute quiz →
Pass it on.
A few minutes to read. A few seconds to send.
Share on X Facebook LinkedIn Email
The Sports Page
Or scan, for sharing the old-fashioned way.
QR Code to thesportspage.net
thesportspage.net
© 2026 The Sports Page · A Statistical Dispatch for Friends & Family